'Request to the court for a long time. The case does not end. I don't know when it will end. The police used to eat Sharabat, Morabba Banai. And still, after all that, I made the blamed for the situation. I would prefer not to live any longer. Need to kick the bucket I have been available for this situation for quite a while. The court does not clear me of the case, nor rebuffs me. "
Tejgaon Police Station Officer-in-Charge Abdur Razzak recorded the argument against three individuals, including Ashtipat Rabeya Khatun on June 2, 2002 for keeping illicit arms and shots in guardianship. Case number 1938/02 Then he was captured, condemned to a half year in jail for safeguard moreover. Afterward, on March 24, 2003, the preliminary of the body of evidence began with claims against two denounced, Julhas and Masood.
Rabeya Khatun was captured from the south side of the place of 3/A Garden Road, Kazi Abdul Zahid of Tejgaon Police Station region. Amid the capture, police requested the recuperation of a remote gun and six rounds of shots from him. The unprotected man has been hanging for a long time in Dhaka's court verdant to dispose of the case.
Rabeya's court was on Wednesday, yesterday. At 9.30 am, he showed up in the staff of the Dhaka Metropolitan 1 Additional Judge Court, in the stomach. Wear glasses and maxi eyes. Polythene pack with one hand, with portable. Showed up on the back seat of the house room. It has been amazed the age gathering. In the event that you need to think about the case with a nature, he will shout so anyone can hear, 'In the event that anybody cut me off my throat, at that point I would likewise get harmony.' This torment does not end. '
Rabeyer conceived in Samirpur town of Daulatpur region of Manikganj locale. After the marriage, Dad did not relinquish his in-law's home. The spouse of Shahjahan Siraj, an inhabitant of Tangail locale, was cultivating. After freedom, Cholera turned into the pandemic of the nation and kicked the bucket subsequent to experiencing this sickness. Leave two young ladies. Presently Rabeya is remaining at her more youthful girl's home in Kazipara, Mirpur. From that point, go to the court each day.
The young lady Laily and her child in-law lived in 2002 close to the Ander Bridge in Karwan Bazar Kazipara. Upon the arrival of the episode, a group of Tejgaon Police Station and its power alongside the Phensidyl attackers partook in the drive. Around then, there was Rabeya's drinking-coffeehouse in the cigarette. Rabeya stated, "Let the Daroga (SI) sit in the house. Make Morabba and Sharbat. As of now, an individual named Bachchu (police source) went into the room and stated, a grandma gave a stick. That is the reason he yelled while finding a stick from inside the house, we got it, got it. She handles a sack with a weapon. At that point Dargoa reveals to me that the auntie will go to Tejgaon police headquarters to give her an observer. In the wake of going to the police headquarters, I gave a hints. I remain in the police headquarters around evening time. The following day I had the capacity to run the court. In the wake of taking the court, the judge told the daroga, for what reason would you say you are taking this elderly person? In the event that you see one, you need to get him?
At that point left safeguard for a half year in prison. From that point forward, when a month, we need to show up under the watchful eye of the court. Rabeya claims that she is 104 years of age. Be that as it may, in the 2002 police case, Rabeya has been referenced in the age of 60 years. As she is 77 years of age Rabeyar legal counselor Mehdi Hassan Palash said the blamed is more than 80 years for age. Police as a rule compose the blamed less regularly on the off chance that for the charged.
Not just old like Rabeya, there are endless instances of such cases in Dhaka courts. Numerous individuals have passed on before the preliminary is finished. The indictment of the case did not finish until an observer for quite a while. The quantity of postponed preliminaries is expanding step by step.
Legal advisors said that in various courts including Dhaka, numerous sorts of cases including ladies tyke torment, murder, medicate and dowan have been pending. In these cases, the quantity of absolved and quittance of the charged is higher. They said that the quick and viable preliminary required for fast transfer of cases, legitimate examination, convenient accommodation of proof, coordination of police and express investigator's activities, and expanded court limit.
The criminal procedures of the nation have been drawn out for different reasons. Legislators said delay in accommodation of the examination report of the case, delay in accommodation of legal procedures, because of nonattendance of observers and legal emergency. The quantity of criminal cases pending in the legal executive is expanding step by step and due to non-settlement of the cases, the choice is baffling among the judges. Therefore, the judges are denied of equity in due time.
As per the wellsprings of the law service, the quantity of criminal cases pending in the lower courts of the nation is more than 17.5 million. Of this, in excess of 250,000 cases have been pending for over five years.
Concerning transfer of the case, Metropolitan Public Prosecutor (PP) Abdullah Abu told Samkal, "I don't have the foggiest idea why the preliminary is postponed. It ought to have been told by the concerned PPP of the court that the preliminary isn't being finished due to not being in the observer court for quite a while. He said that the case will be taken rapidly to settle the case.
Criminal master Mosharraf Hossain Kajal told Samkal, "The court is represented by its law. On the off chance that the individual who is a judge approaches with a legal perspective and mentality, at that point it is conceivable to take care of the considerable number of issues. Here the state side will likewise approached. An individual has been coming to court for quite a while. In any case, his case isn't settled. The judge must get this.
Promoter Elina Khan, Chief Executive Officer of Bangladesh Human Rights Foundation, told Samkal, "Numerous individuals are continually being bugged in such a case. We have fallen into a culture of oppression. The motivation behind why an old lady is blamed in the arms case is to know it first. At that point he was experiencing sufferings for quite a while. Showing up under the watchful eye of the court, yet the case isn't settled. In our CRPC, we need to settle the case inside 360 days. Presently on the off chance that everybody facilitates their duties from their position, at that point there is no issue. The judge, the examiner of the arraignment and the respondent of the litigant is responsible for this issue. The state will likewise need to attract regard for the issue in court. For what reason should this older lady need to show up under the steady gaze of the court each month, why her attorney isn't introducing her.
Mehedi Hasan Palash, legal counselor of Rabeya Khatun, stated, "An old woman is regarding the law and managing the case. In any case, not getting equity for quite a while He showed up under the steady gaze of the court on each date to substantiate himself honest. The case isn't settled. This is a very well-requested occasion. 2002 case. The arraignment neglected to create observers in court. Witness isn't desiring 5 years. Recently, the court of the PP educated the judge about the demise regarding the examination officer of this case. At the season of the judge Al Mamun guided the DMP chief to present the report of the passing of the exploring officer of the case.
He further stated, 'The last judge's case was finished after the seeing and the litigants fixed themselves for guard. Be that as it may, after another judge came later, the day was fixed for affirmation again from the resistance. For as far back as five years no observer for this situation is coming to court to give proof. However the case is going on. This case will keep going forever. Possibly one day the blamed will kick the bucket. The exploring officer (IO) of the case kicked the bucket quite a while back. His declaration was not gotten. Indeed, even the weapons recouped from Rabeya were not seized. Subsequently, the case can not be settled. Rabeya Khatun is extremely wiped out and poor. Like clockwork, he needs to offer blood to one pack of his body. He can not pay the expenses. Never give two hundred rupees. This case is being taken care of for mankind.
In the interim, the examiner's legal advisor Abdul Sattar Dulal disclosed to Samkal that the case was for proof. The examination officer's declaration is as yet not accessible. The observer of the examination officer is imperative to demonstrate the case. He said nobody told the court that examination officer of the case passed on. Besides, I don't have any data about this, which I will show to the court. He will attract thoughtfulness regarding the court when the report is distributed in the paper, he said.
It is said for the situation that the blamed Rabeya Khatun was captured alongside a rough clothing pack while escaping from the southern side of Kazirpara Abdul Zahid's 3/A Garden Road, Tejgaon Police Station territory. Amid the capture, a remote gun and 6 rounds of shots were recuperated from him. Rabeya was engaged with two more charged Julhas and Masood. The legal advisor stated, Julhas was the child of Rabeya's girl in-law. The police returned home that day to get him. It is realized that Julhas kicked the bucket. Rabeya has been blamed for the situation for the case.
On September 19, 2002, the researching officer of the case SI Abdul Aziz presented a chargesheet against the two denounced, in the wake of looking at 12 individuals after the examination. Another blamed, Masud, did not locate the best possible name and address, the exclusion was prescribed. Julhas is presently slipping away in the court record. For the situation up until this point, the examiner has exhibited 6 individuals in court to 12 witnesses.
On account of 6 observers for the situation, three of 2007 saw three. Of course in 2014 another three saw. No different observer has gone to the court since eleventh May 2014. On 6 November, 2016 the candidate of the charged Rabeya Khatun has completed his declaration and advances for the accompanying exercises. Judge Ruhul Amin allowed the application and fixed the date for the respondent's protection. On October 28, 2012 another judge came in and fixed the case for further reconsideration rather than the litigant's safeguard.
0 Comments